home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0093>
- <title>
- Jan. 09, 1989: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Jan. 09, 1989 Mississippi Burning
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 36
- America Abroad
- Virtuoso Transformations
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> Rarely have the prospects for diplomacy seemed so bright at
- the beginning of a new year. High hopes for 1989 are the result
- of high drama in 1988. Twice, just as the curtain was coming
- down on the old year, a major figure stepped to the edge of the
- footlights and delivered a soliloquy intended to persuade the
- world that he is tired of playing a villain. He pledged that the
- policies he represents had changed in fundamental and salutary
- ways. And the audience, including a skeptical American
- President, applauded.
- </p>
- <p> First came Mikhail Gorbachev. In his speech to the United
- Nations last month, he promised to change practically
- everything about the Soviet Union except its name (and,
- presumably, its leader). Asked at a press conference the next
- day whether he believed Gorbachev was sincere in trying to
- remake the Soviet Union into a less threatening country, Ronald
- Reagan replied, "Yes, I do." Coming from the longtime and
- unabashed cold warrior, in the midst of his own swan song, those
- three words were almost as significant as Gorbachev's hour-long
- oration.
- </p>
- <p> The star of last year's other showstopper was Yasser
- Arafat. His performance in the theater of self-transformation
- was more drawn out, and the applause more restrained.
- Gorbachev's act was tough to follow in more ways than one. The
- idea of meaningful change is easier to accept when it comes from
- someone with a relatively fresh face and a reputation for
- boldness and candor. Decades of familiarity with Arafat's role
- as both Jekyll and Hyde have bred if not contempt then at least
- deep suspicion. The effect of Arafat's trademarks -- the
- kaffiyeh, the pseudo uniform, the cultivated scruffiness, the
- holster (empty or otherwise) -- often hovers between the silly
- and the sinister. He is the sort of survivor who tends to give
- survival a bad name. His longevity has often seemed the
- consequence not of constancy but of artful dodging.
- </p>
- <p> Coming from Arafat, flexibility sounds like double-talk. It
- is double-talk. That is often the language of politics,
- particularly in the Middle East, where the vocabulary of
- straight talk is almost always made up of fighting words. Arafat
- may still be talking out of both sides of his mouth, but there
- is an important change in the ratio: there are fewer euphemisms
- for terrorism and more code words for a negotiated settlement
- of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
- </p>
- <p> Arafat's critics, especially in Jerusalem, have grumbled
- about the "ambiguities" of his concessions. Yet Israel's own
- position has also been ambiguous over the years. For a decade
- after the 1967 Six-Day War, a succession of Labor Prime
- Ministers seemed willing to yield portions of the territory the
- Israeli army had seized in the West Bank of the Jordan River,
- where many Palestinian Arabs live, in exchange for recognition
- and security. During that period, Arafat and the Palestine
- Liberation Organization regarded Israel itself as an integral
- part of the larger territory of "occupied" Palestine that they
- were sworn to "liberate."
- </p>
- <p> The P.L.O. has now accepted Israel's right to exist, and
- the U.S. -- in its own contribution to the finale of 1988 --
- has accepted that acceptance. But Israel's new government is
- steered by Likud's Yitzhak Shamir, who refuses to budge from one
- inch of the West Bank. If only his position on that key issue
- were a little more ambiguous. The recent diplomatic progress
- between the Arabs and the U.S., however welcome, could still end
- up being a sideshow to the tragedy of the principals passing in
- the night. As the P.L.O.'s leaders are becoming less
- rejectionist, Israel's are becoming more so. Israel may be
- undergoing a self-transformation of the wrong kind.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-